Don't set goals, wonder

As a coach, one of the main contributions I make is to help people clarify and set goals.

My own experience of this is that it works almost magically. In 2008, when moving to the US, my wife found a copy of my 2001 goals (before we met). There were goals in the areas of career (founding a business), relationships (getting married), playing Bridge for England, getting out of debt, learning to meditate, becoming an author, and running a 5k. Although I'd not set eyes on these since written, they were all achieved.

The theory for how this works, is if seriously undertaken, goals lodge themselves in the subconscious and subtly direct our priorities and how we see the world. Now new research sheds further light on some of the 'magic' (code for dimly understood psychology) that helps realize goals.

Now new research ( http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=the-willpower-paradox )shows that holding goals loosely (as I did) and as a question, 'will I', rather than 'I will' maybe actually yield better results.

The mechanism, it seems, is that tightly held goals framed as 'I will' lead to a reward/ punishment schemata, whereas holding them as an open question allows for experimentation, small failures without harsh self-critique, and an openness to new ways of seeing the world that are less constrained by the harsher 'Ich will'.

I've frequently helped business leaders to view strategy in this way.  From one point of view there is a very 'male' approach to strategy, set goals, remove obstacles and stick with them.  More emergent ('feminine') approaches sense the future (pattern recognition) as it emerges.  Strategic goals are a feature of new situations, but openness to the world as it unfolds allows the seizing of as yet unconceived opportunities and a more dynamic approach to direction setting.  Both are valuable, but the second prospers in times of complexity, when the strategic landscape is changing too rapidly for single-minded approaches to work.

This was most relevant during my recent career change.  As I left writing behind, I could have chosen a number of different paths, becoming a partner at Accenture, or one at a smaller firm, becoming head of HR or Talent for a Fortune 100 company, found a new consulting firm, or run a consulting network and deliver value through a number of collaborations with other consulting firms.  As I pursued all of these in parallel, the feedback from the marketplace was in favor of the latter.  And as I interviewed with big consulting and big companies, I received emotional data about how the new positions might unfold.   By setting my goals loosely and paying attention to what the market was telling me, I found a path of least resistance through a complex period.

This new research strikes me as a good place to experiment:  frame the goal as a question, expand the horizons of possibility, and put the riding crop (which most people use for encouragement) down.  You might be happier and realize more of your ambitions!