Leadership development principles, approach and methodology

What characterizes the approach?

  • Holistic. The effectiveness of a leader is a function of not just thinking, but of emotions and moods, purpose and values, and their body.  The best programs get to grips with all of these levels. 
  • Deep. By the time an individual reaches forty, many aspects of their character will have begun to ossify.  In areas such as conflict, speaking inspirationally, and working on teams the habits and predispositions will have started to form when they are very young and are hard to change.  Superficial methods fail.
  • Longitudinal. Deep personal change does not happen during a two-day offsite.  Leaders need new habits and new practices, and the gravity of relapse means they need help sustaining new behaviors.
  • Blended learning.  A fashionable word meaning (in this instance) a combination of team-based learning, coaching, offsite sessions, developmental reading, and new personal practices.
  • Results-oriented.  No organization or executive of today will commit anything like enough time unless the prize is very real for them.  Program participants need clear performance and financial targets which they will realize with the program’s support. 

 

Which methodologies are found?

  • Developmental models (Torbert’s Leadership Development Model, Grave’s Spiral Dynamics)
  • Personal change (Somatics, Linguistic Ontology, Mood, Vision-values)
  • Organizational Change (U-process, Systems Thinking,Integral change model)
  • Teams(Conversations of a team, dynamic modeling, Bion group theory)
  • Negotiation(Interest Based Negotiation, Conflict Styles Inventory)

 

For a more detailed description of some methodologies, please see:

http://www.paulgibbons.net/content/spirituality-they-body-language-and-leadership

Example of program goals using ‘Be, Do, Have’ framework

 

Example of program structure